infallibility

Bonhoeffer on an infallible (or inerrant) church, book, or doctrine

Dietrich Bonhoeffer, a German Lutheran pastor who was executed by the Nazis, continues to rise in fame and prominence in American theology. Many conservatives have been working to co-opt his theology for Evangelicalism, but Bonhoeffer remained thoroughly Lutheran throughout his life. What is especially interesting is that, while Bonhoeffer was seen as fairly conservative in his own setting, his views on Scripture would be seen as wildly liberal by most American Evangelicals.

For example, from student notes on a lecture Bonhoeffer gave on Karl Barth’s theology: “Be it an infallible church, Book or Doctrine, all these assume that there is a spot in the world which is not fallen and thus exempt from sinfulness. But the only part of the world free from Sin and its positive correlative is Christ Jesus… and He alone is the ultimate authority…” (DBWE 13:315 [Dietrich Bonhoeffer: London, 1933-1935]).

While brief, Bonhoeffer’s point could not be more anathema to those who claim that inerrancy is a necessary doctrine for Christianity. Bonhoeffer notes that any claims to infallibility (which is often seen as even less powerful a word than inerrancy, though Bonhoeffer could not have referred to inerrancy as the doctrine had not even been developed yet) of church, book (including the Bible!), or doctrine (including inerrancy!) is necessarily part of the fallen world and so not exempt from sinfulness. In other words, no book–even the Bible–can be seen as free from the corrupting influence of sin. Bonhoeffer instead sees Christ alone as the ultimate authority on God.

While inerrantists might attempt to counter this argument by saying things like “but how do we know about Christ?”–the implication being that we can only know about Christ through the Bible–this not only discounts the power of the Holy Spirit, but it also merely reaffirms the point that we do not need an inerrant Scripture to know about God. God instead enters into our world as the ultimate authority in Christ, coming as a human being in a way that is seen as foolishness to the world–including the inerrantists who try to raise Scripture to the level of Christ.

Bonhoeffer’s last words recorded in the lecture notes reflect this: “…God’s will crosses out all human will and effort. Hence the cross is a judgement. Thus the word of the cross which is foolishness and a stumbling block is the ultimate authority” (ibid).

Bonhoeffer’s argument thus directly answers and even chastises the inerrantist rejoinder, noting that they have raised that which is human will and effort–whether church, Book, or Doctrine–to the level of God and that the cross pronounces judgement upon that idea through Christ as ultimate authority.

Now, these words come from student notes on his lectures, but they by no means go against what Bonhoeffer says elsewhere about the doctrine of Scripture and Christology. For Bonhoeffer, and indeed for traditional Lutheranism that has not been co-opted by Evangelical thinking points, inerrancy was a moot point because God alone is without error and has already revealed Godself to us in Christ.

What so many American Evangelical fans of Bonhoeffer continue to misunderstand–and even, sadly, distort–is that Bonhoeffer was through and through a German Lutheran, not an American Evangelical. I am hopeful that as more continue to explore Bonhoeffer’s life and works, they find in Bonhoeffer not an enemy, but perhaps a challenge or correction to their theology and ethics as well.

All Links to Amazon are Affiliates links

Links

Dietrich Bonhoeffer– read all my posts related to Bonhoeffer and his theology.

Be sure to check out the page for this site on Facebook and Twitter for discussion of posts, links to other pages of interest, random talk about theology/philosophy/apologetics/movies and more!

SDG.

——

The preceding post is the property of J.W. Wartick (apart from quotations, which are the property of their respective owners, and works of art as credited; images are often freely available to the public and J.W. Wartick makes no claims of owning rights to the images unless he makes that explicit) and should not be reproduced in part or in whole without the expressed consent of the author. All content on this site is the property of J.W. Wartick and is made available for individual and personal usage. If you cite from these documents, whether for personal or professional purposes, please give appropriate citation with both the name of the author (J.W. Wartick) and a link to the original URL. If you’d like to repost a post, you may do so, provided you show less than half of the original post on your own site and link to the original post for the rest. You must also appropriately cite the post as noted above. This blog is protected by Creative Commons licensing. By viewing any part of this site, you are agreeing to this usage policy.

Really Recommended Posts: 6/7/13- Mormonism, The Ice Age, and more!

Dear Reader, it is now that time to once more share with you my own wanderings across the internet. I have brought to you a random mix of posts which interested me. Given that you still choose to read my site, you probably have some random interests which match my own. Thus, I’ve done your work for you. For free. No problem. Just check out the posts! This week, we have the Ice Age and Creationism, Mormonism, Papal Infallibility,Constantine, the need for apologetics, and an archaeological mystery for you to solve. Leave a comment. Let me know what you liked. Have a post you think I need to read? Well, pass it along!

Mormonism and Christianity: which one is supported by the evidence?– Do you like evidence to go along with your beliefs? I sure do. Wintery Knight investigates the claims of Mormonism and Christianity to discern which one has better evidential support. Read this… you will not be disappointed.

The Pleistocene is Not in the Bible– “Pleistocene” is basically a fancy name for “Ice Age.” Check out this post, which investigates one major young earth creationist claim about the Ice Age and the Bible.

Before “Infallibility” Was a Twinkling in a Pope’s Eye– I found this post very interesting because I have a major love for historical theology and the interplay between history and theology. The author explores the historical development of Papal Infallibility.

It Should Never have Come to That Point– I found this a powerful call for churches to engage in apologetics. I think apologetics is a vital educational tool and anyone who says we don’t need it needs to think again. Check out my own post as a call to apologetics.

Was Constantine a Christian or Pagan?– Constantine has a pretty bad reputation in many circles. Here, Max Andrews addresses some of the more pressing questions about Constantine’s life. I think that in places the case is overstated, but he brings to light many interesting issues to discuss. Look forward to a post from me on Constantine sometime in the (fairly distant) future.

Massive submerged structure stumps Israeli archaeologists– I found this an interesting little piece of archaeological mystery. What was this thing? I’ll be taking your submissions in the comments here.

As always, note that my linking to a post does not entail my endorsement of all of its content.