Christianity and Science, Creationism, Science, Young Earth Creationism

Naturalis Historia: Is Young Earth Creationism True?

I recently came upon what is, in my opinion, the finest collection of essays challenging the scientific aspects of Young Earth Creationism to date. The blog, Naturalis Historia features a broad spectrum of posts offering challenges to Young Earth perspectives from a scientific viewpoint. I can’t recommend the blog highly enough. Below are a few links with brief summaries of the contents.

An Ancient and Alien Forest Reconstructed– the recent finds of several fossilized forests have revealed alien landscapes not similar to our own forests in any way. In fact, many of these ancient forests lack any kind of flowering plant whatsoever. If the biodiversity found across all of fossil history is compressed into a young earth timespan, the possibility of explaining these anomalous forests without contemporary features becomes extremely difficult for young earthers. Another forest found in New York exacerbates the problem.

The impact craters from various meteorites presents another difficulty for YEC. Dating these craters puts them well beyond the allowances of a young earth perspective, but the young earth explanations stretch credibility beyond the breaking point.

What of dinosaur eggs? The fact is that these eggs are found across the various strata. Now most YECs I have read argue that the large amounts of sediment across the earth were deposited by the Flood. If that is the case, then how did these dinosaur nests appear across various layers. Natural Historian put forward this challenge in the post, “Juvenile Dinosaur Fossils In a Nest…”  One current YEC explanation is that the dinosaurs moved on top of the sediment as it was deposited and laid their eggs on the various layers, which were then covered as the rains continued to fall. The problem is that discoveries have now been made of juveniles in these nests, which would mean they would have had to hatch and grow before being buried by the Flood. Again, this truly stretches credulity beyond the breaking point.

What is the point of linking to these posts and challenging YEC? I am a devout Christian and I’ve struggled with the issues involved in this debate myself. I’ve written extensively on the topics involved and I continually seek to read and understand more about the debate. So why have I been focusing on rebutting YEC? The more I’ve read on the topics involved, the more I’ve realized that YEC truly does undermine the Christian faith. I’m not suggesting those who defend YEC are actively seeking to discredit Christianity; no, I think that YECs generally have their hearts in the right place–they are seeking to defend what they view as the only possible Biblical position against attack. The problem is that when one investigates the scientific evidence, one finds that if one ties Christianity to YEC, it simply cannot hold up to a deep investigation. The issues above are just a number of peripheral problems with YEC, and I don’t see any feasible answers forthcoming on just those topics. There are a great many to be found over at Naturalis Historia, as well as across the web. We must not marry Christianity to positions that are indefensible.


About J.W. Wartick

J.W. Wartick is a Lutheran, feminist, Christ-follower. A Science Fiction snob, Bonhoeffer fan, Paleontology fanboy and RPG nerd.


8 thoughts on “Naturalis Historia: Is Young Earth Creationism True?

  1. What’s your creatyion belief?

    Posted by Mike Riter | November 19, 2013, 10:44 PM
    • I’m not sure I would comfortably fit within any specific paradigm. I lean towards the views held by Reasons to Believe (Old Earth Creationism), but we would differ on some areas. I prefer to keep an open mind, because I do not think the biblical text provides enough data to decide the matter in a scientific sense.

      Posted by J.W. Wartick | November 19, 2013, 10:47 PM
  2. Yec know that neither The Gap nor any Day-Age scenarios are Biblical and they have extremely sound proof.

    Posted by Mike Riter | November 19, 2013, 10:47 PM
    • Well those certainly are not all the positions available, and I completely disagree on the notion tha they “have extremely sound proof.” I have argued to the contrary, at length, in a number of places here. This may be my best individual post on discussing alleged YEC proofs.

      Posted by J.W. Wartick | November 19, 2013, 10:50 PM
  3. Yec think they have us beat in the Biblical sense because, they think we have no sound Biblical proof of any OEC theory. We must show them that YEC is Biblically wrong and not just scientifically wrong.

    Posted by Mike Riter | November 19, 2013, 10:58 PM
  4. I can tell you they have sound proof only on the two I mentioned. I’m an oild earth believer, working on Biblical proof that the earth is not young. I love your info.!!!

    Posted by Mike Riter | November 19, 2013, 11:02 PM
    • I very much disagree with your assessment of YECs having “sound proof” against those positions. I have explored this issue for several years now, which by no means makes me an expert, but I also grew up as a YEC and I simply see no successful argument for the position. Moreover, I do not know of any sound refutation of the primary competing OEC positions.

      Posted by J.W. Wartick | November 19, 2013, 11:08 PM


  1. Pingback: Articles. « Loftier Musings - April 10, 2012

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,864 other subscribers


Like me on Facebook: Always Have a Reason
%d bloggers like this: